Language is generally defined as "[w]ords and the methods of combining them for the expression of thought",1 and more specifically as "[t]he whole body of words and of methods of combination of words used by a nation, people, or race" and as "a system of conventional spoken or written symbols by means of which human beings, as members of a social group and participants in its culture, express themselves".2, 3 As mentioned in the latter definition language can be divided into spoken language and written language and in this contemplation we shall focus on the first and thus on language as defined as the "[p]ower or faculty of speech".4
Sometimes the term 'language' is also applied to the modes in which animals and plants communicate with each other,5 however this of course does not imply them having the faculty of spoken language, which is the prerogative of humans. And a human is in the ageless wisdom considered as consisting of different principles. For the human unit consists according to this wisdom of monad (or spirit), soul (or consciousness) and personality (or matter).6 This monad is further divided into power, love-wisdom and active intelligence, the soul into spiritual will (atma), intuition (buddhi) and the abstract mind and the personality into the concrete mind or the mental body, the emotional or the astral body and the physical body, which in turn consists of a subtle or etheric physical body and a dense physical body.7 Now considering the subtle physical body and the dense physical body as one principle,8 and considering the threefold monad in its unity (corresponding to the Holy Trinity on a higher level)9 we arrive at a sevenfold division of man.10, 11 Another way to arrive at a sevenfold division is by considering the spiritual will or atma as representing the monad and considering the two constituents of the physical body (dense and subtle) as separate.12, 13
So man is a sevenfold, but he is not the only sevenfold in existence. According to the ageless wisdom basically everything in manifestation unfolds as a sevenfold.14 Following the so called 'Law of Correspondences' or 'Law of Analogy' it may then be interesting to explore language in its correspondences to the sevenfold human constitution.15, 16
Exploring correspondences of the constitution of language with that of man we shall start with what is most familiar to us; the dense physical body. This given in man corresponds with the vocality in language. Besides through vocalizing, linguistic expression is also possible without the use of the vocal cords, as in whispering. This whispering corresponds to the subtle physical or etheric body. Following the line from gross to subtle the next principle in man regards the emotional body. This principle corresponds with intonation in language. Everyone can hear the difference between the speech of a highly emotional person and that of an emotional calm person. These aforementioned parts of language can be said to constitute more or less what academic linguistic sciences call 'the phonetics' of a language.17 Next in line comes the concrete mind or the mental body, and this part in man corresponds to what academic linguistic sciences call 'the syntax' of a language, regarding the arrangements and connections of words.18 These words, singular and together connected and arranged, carry meanings, by academic linguistic sciences called 'semantics',19 and this layer of language corresponds with the abstract mind in man. It is with the abstract mind that meanings are understood. The next level up regards the intuition. This principle in man corresponds to the intention in language. Although certain (dim) reflections of intention are discussed in academic philosophy under the name of 'intentionality'20 the intention of the intuition is at present not part of academic linguistic research. And with the spiritual will being an even higher principle than the intuition it shall be clear that the linguistic correspondence thereof is also not academically discussed. This correspondence regards the significance in language.
That above linguistic intention is posited as corresponding with the intuition and significance with the spiritual will or atma also follows the distinctions that are made in the ageless wisdom between the worlds of symbol, of meaning and of significance.21 In this distinction the world of symbol is linked to the personality, the world of meaning to the soul and the world of significance to the monad or the spiritual triad.22 These worlds correspond to the world of appearances, the world of values and the world of purpose.23
Considering all of the above we get an overview as below.
Threefold man | Sevenfold man I | Sevenfold man II | Language layers | Academic linguistics | Worlds I | Worlds II |
Monad | Monad | Spiritual will | Significance or purpose | World of significance | World of purpose | |
Soul | Spiritual will | World of meaning | World of values | |||
Intuition | Intuition | Intention | ||||
Abstract mind | Abstract mind | Meaning | Semantics | |||
Personality | Concrete mind | Concrete mind | Arrangement | Syntaxes | World of symbol | World of appearances |
Emotion | Emotion | Intonation | Phonetics | |||
Physical body | Subtle physical body | Whispering | ||||
Dense physical body | Vocality |
Figure 1.
So what does the above overview tell us about language? Basically it can be deduced that language originates in a purpose and a significance that clothed in intention and meaning express themselves through arrangements, intonations, whisperings and vocalities. Or when considered down-top: A linguistic expression is not just an arranged and intonated sound carrying and conveying meanings, as academic linguistic sciences may consider, but it also has an underlying intention and significance or purpose.
The above deduction can be applied on more than one given. One expressed sentence indeed has vocality, intonation, arrangement, meaning and on deeper levels intention, significance or purpose, but it must be understood that following this line highly abstract levels are entered. And because an abstract is the source of many mutually similar particulars24 it can be understood that many similar expressions may have one meaning, many meanings one intention, many intentions one significance or purpose.
If all the expressions of one person in one lifetime would be gathered and traced back to their mutual abstract sources perhaps the meaning, intention, significance or even the purpose of that life could be grasped. After all it was stated that language is the prerogative of humans.
But similarly also all the expressions of one entire language could be gathered and traced back to their sources, revealing thus the significance or purpose of that language. After all it are not just individual humans that have souls. If entire nations, races and religions are considered as soul expressions,25, 26 then why not consider languages likewise?27 For Charlemange (747/748-814) had presumably said that "to have a second language is to have a second soul",28 and the above contemplation moves surely in that direction.